|
|
|||
Driving north on Highway 61 near the shore of Lake Superior, I am struck by the contrast between the natural roadside vegetation on the right side and the lawns on the left. On the right: graceful white birches, native cedars heavy with cones, mounds of wispy willows, and in bloom, goldenrod and purple and white asters, with occasional Joe-Pye weed, yarrow, and fireweed. Sumacs layered along a hillside. Sturdy blue-green spruces of all sizes. On the left: shorn lawn. Sometimes an entire yard has been turned over to lawn. Other yards display a few trees, usually not the same trees you find on the right. I saw one willow, its natural shape clipped away so that just a few branches remained. What is beautiful to different people differs tremendously. I'm a city-dweller who takes holidays here because I admire this particular natural landscape, and I've spent years trying to create a garden that will offer the same pleasure and stimulation that I find when exploring the Lake Superior region. Yet many people who live in my ideal landscape apparently prefer to be surrounded by low, tidy lawns and the same popular trees you'd find in backyards throughout much of the country. Perhaps it's not that simple. I've heard many people say they think their native landscape is beautiful, but they wouldn't want their yard to look like that. My grandparents are classic examples. They live in the high desert of southern Idaho, and they both admire the subtle colors of the sparse desert vegetation and particularly the abundant rocky outcrops. Yet their yard consists of an extensive lawn and banks of evergreen shrubs, as if they need a green shield to counter all that brown and gray. Maybe the desert makes a person crave an oasis. So I've been wondering, is natural landscaping an "acquired taste"? Do our minds, by default, contain two separate categories that must be kept distinct: garden and wilderness? If so, how does a person learn to see the beauty of a natural landscape? It might be helpful to understand the differences between natural and artificial (human-created) landscapes. I've noticed three of them.
People may come to value natural landscaping because they enjoy observing wildlife and realize it's the best way to attract animals to the garden. Others see it as a low-maintenance option, a more enduring plant cover that discourages opportunistic weeds. Some are drawn to how a natural landscape looks during a certain season (spring in the deciduous woodlands, autumn on the prairie) or how it changes over the seasons. There may also be people like me who feel that modern life tends too much toward order and predictability, and it restores our perspective to introduce a little chaos. |
Other LessLawn viewpoints.
Read about characteristics of healthy natural landscapes that our traditional garden practices work against. |
Thanks for visiting http://www.LessLawn.com! All site contents © 2001-2013 Evelyn J. Hadden, except where noted. All rights reserved. |